AME 5 End of Unit

Correct Answer:

A. Inadequate gelcoat thickness, high moisture content in the hull, and poor bonding between laminate layers.

• Explanation:
  1. Inadequate gelcoat thickness: The gelcoat acts as a barrier to moisture ingress. If it is too thin or improperly applied, moisture can penetrate through to the laminate layers, leading to osmotic blistering.
  2. High moisture content in the hull: Moisture ingress into the laminate layers causes osmotic blistering. When water is trapped within the laminate, it creates pressure and forms blisters in the gelcoat.
  3. Poor bonding between laminate layers: If the bond between the laminate layers is weak, moisture can infiltrate the layers more easily, leading to the formation of osmotic blisters. Proper bonding is crucial for preventing moisture-related damage.

Incorrect Answers:

B. Excessive paint thickness, incorrect hull shape, and poor surface cleaning.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Excessive paint thickness: While excessive paint thickness can affect the hull’s appearance and performance, it does not directly cause osmotic blisters. Osmosis is more related to the laminate layers and moisture ingress rather than paint.
  2. Incorrect hull shape: Hull shape issues can affect performance and structural integrity but do not directly cause osmotic blisters, which are more related to moisture penetration and laminate issues.
  3. Poor surface cleaning: Poor cleaning can affect adhesion and aesthetics but does not directly contribute to the formation of osmotic blisters, which are primarily caused by moisture infiltration and laminate issues.

C. Excessive use of anti-fouling coatings, improper adhesive application, and high ambient temperatures during construction.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Excessive use of anti-fouling coatings: Anti-fouling coatings are used to prevent marine growth and do not cause osmotic blisters. They can impact the surface but are not a direct cause of osmotic issues.
  2. Improper adhesive application: Adhesive application issues are more related to bonding materials rather than causing osmotic blisters. Osmotic blisters result from moisture infiltration within the laminate.
  3. High ambient temperatures during construction: While high temperatures can affect curing, they are not a direct cause of osmotic blisters. Osmosis is related to moisture ingress and gelcoat issues rather than temperature alone.

D. Frequent washing with harsh chemicals, inadequate hull ventilation, and incorrect storage conditions.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Frequent washing with harsh chemicals: This can damage the surface but does not directly lead to osmotic blisters, which are caused by moisture penetrating the laminate.
  2. Inadequate hull ventilation: Poor ventilation can lead to moisture buildup but is not as directly linked to osmotic blisters as the other factors listed in option A.
  3. Incorrect storage conditions: While storage conditions can affect the overall condition of the hull, osmotic blisters are primarily related to moisture ingress through the laminate and gelcoat rather than storage alone.

Correct Answer:

C. Cut away the blistered area entirely, clean and dry the exposed surface, fill the void with a marine-grade filler, and then sand, prime, and repaint the area.

• Explanation: The proper procedure for treating a single osmotic blister involves removing the blistered area to expose the underlying void. Once the blister is cut away, the exposed surface must be thoroughly cleaned to remove any contaminants and dried completely to ensure that no moisture remains. After this, a marine-grade filler (such as an epoxy filler) is used to fill the void, restoring the hull's smooth surface. The area is then sanded to match the surrounding hull, primed to ensure good adhesion, and repainted to protect the repair. This method ensures that the blister is fully removed and the structural integrity of the hull is restored.

Incorrect Answers:

A. Sand the blister until it is flush with the surrounding hull, then apply a layer of antifouling paint to seal the area.

• Why it's incorrect: Simply sanding the blister flush with the hull does not address the underlying cause of the blister, which is the accumulation of fluid and pressure within the laminate. Without removing the blister and treating the void, the problem may reoccur or worsen. Additionally, applying antifouling paint does not adequately seal or repair the damaged area.

B. Drill a small hole into the blister to release the pressure, then fill the void with epoxy resin before sanding and repainting the area.

• Why it's incorrect: While drilling a hole might relieve pressure temporarily, it does not fully remove the damaged laminate or the contaminants within the blister. This method can leave weakened areas in the hull and might not effectively prevent the blister from reforming. The best practice is to remove the blister entirely rather than just draining it.

D. Heat the blister with a blowtorch until it deflates, then apply a layer of fiberglass cloth over the area to reinforce the hull.

• Why it's incorrect: Using heat to deflate the blister is not a recommended practice and could cause further damage to the GRP laminate. Heat can weaken the resin and the fiberglass structure, leading to larger issues. Additionally, applying fiberglass cloth over the blister without removing the damaged material does not properly address the underlying problem and may lead to further blistering or structural weaknesses.

Correct Answer:

A. Root whitening refers to a discoloration or fading of the gelcoat layer, most commonly occurring around the waterline and hull sections exposed to high UV radiation.

• Explanation:
  1. Root whitening: This term describes the phenomenon where the gelcoat layer of a GRP hull develops a white, faded appearance. It is caused by the degradation of the gelcoat due to prolonged exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light and environmental conditions.
  2. Waterline and UV exposure: These areas are particularly susceptible to root whitening because they are frequently exposed to sunlight and the environment. The waterline, in particular, is a common location for this issue due to its constant exposure to varying water conditions and UV radiation.

Incorrect Answers:

B. Root whitening describes a pattern of cracking in the laminate layers, most likely to occur in the keel and bilge areas where there is excessive moisture exposure.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Pattern of cracking: Root whitening is not related to cracking in the laminate layers. Instead, it concerns the discoloration or fading of the gelcoat surface.
  2. Keel and bilge areas: While these areas are prone to other issues like moisture damage, root whitening specifically affects the gelcoat layer exposed to UV radiation, rather than areas affected by moisture and structural stress.

C. Root whitening is the effect of resin bleeding through the laminate, typically seen in the transom and stern areas where construction materials are poorly bonded.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Resin bleeding: Root whitening does not involve resin bleeding through the laminate. It is related to the degradation of the gelcoat layer.
  2. Transom and stern: Root whitening is more commonly associated with UV exposure around the waterline and hull, rather than specific construction issues or bonding problems in the transom and stern areas.

D. Root whitening is the formation of white patches or discoloration in the laminate due to stress, most frequently found in the midship section and areas around the strakes.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. White patches due to stress: Root whitening is not related to stress-induced discoloration in the laminate. It specifically involves the degradation of the gelcoat layer due to UV exposure.
  2. Midship section and strakes: While stress and impact can cause issues in these areas, root whitening is most commonly associated with UV exposure around the waterline and hull, rather than specific stress-related discoloration in the midship or strake areas.

Correct Answer: B) By creating a continuous, void-free barrier with improved fiber-to-resin ratio that reduces water absorption.

• Explanation: Resin infusion molding creates a more consistent and continuous laminate with fewer voids compared to traditional methods. The reduced voids and better fiber-to-resin ratio create a more effective barrier against water penetration. This minimizes the potential for osmosis, where water gets trapped within the laminate and causes damage over time.

Incorrect Options:

A) By using a high-temperature curing process that melts any residual moisture in the composite.

• Explanation: Resin infusion molding does not involve high-temperature curing that melts moisture. Instead, it uses vacuum pressure to ensure that the resin infuses completely and evenly into the fabric, thereby reducing voids. Excess moisture is not "melted" but rather prevented by minimizing voids during the infusion process.

C) By applying a gel coat on the outer surface that acts as a sacrificial layer to prevent water ingress.

• Explanation: While applying a gel coat can help prevent water ingress to some extent, it is not specific to the resin infusion process itself. Gel coats are an additional step and are used in conjunction with various construction methods. The primary advantage of resin infusion is in creating a more consistent, void-free laminate, not just relying on an outer gel coat.

D) By using pre-formed glass fiber sheets that are already pre-treated to resist water penetration.

• Explanation: Pre-formed glass fiber sheets might be used in other methods, but resin infusion involves laying dry fibers into the mold and then infusing resin. The process is not about using pre-treated sheets but about achieving a thorough and consistent infusion that minimizes voids, thereby reducing the risk of osmosis.

Correct Answer:

A. Sharp corners or edges in the hull design, excessive weight concentration in specific areas, and insufficient reinforcement in high-stress zones.

• Explanation:
  1. Sharp corners or edges: In GRP hull design, sharp corners and edges create stress concentrations where the material is more likely to crack under pressure or stress. The stress is not evenly distributed, leading to potential cracking at these points.
  2. Excessive weight concentration in specific areas: Concentrating too much weight in one area of the hull can create localized stress that exceeds the material’s strength, leading to stress cracking. Proper weight distribution is crucial to prevent such issues.
  3. Insufficient reinforcement in high-stress zones: Areas of the hull that experience high stress, such as around fittings or at points of impact, require additional reinforcement. Lack of reinforcement in these zones can cause the material to fail and crack under stress.

Incorrect Answers:

B. Use of low-quality resin, over-thickness of the gelcoat layer, and high ambient temperatures during construction.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Low-quality resin: While the use of low-quality resin can affect the durability and strength of the GRP laminate, it is more likely to result in overall weakness or failure rather than specifically causing stress cracking.
  2. Over-thickness of the gelcoat layer: Excessive gelcoat thickness can lead to issues such as cracking, but it is generally more associated with surface cracking rather than stress cracking due to design flaws.
  3. High ambient temperatures during construction: High temperatures can affect curing but are not a direct design problem that leads to stress cracking. This factor is more related to the construction process than design.

C. Poor paint adhesion, incorrect application of anti-fouling coatings, and improper cleaning methods.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Poor paint adhesion: Poor adhesion can lead to paint problems but does not directly cause stress cracking in the laminate.
  2. Incorrect application of anti-fouling coatings: This issue affects the coating layer and not the structural integrity of the GRP laminate.
  3. Improper cleaning methods: Cleaning methods impact the surface appearance and maintenance but are not design issues that cause stress cracking.

D. Excessive use of adhesive sealants, inadequate hull ventilation, and frequent washing with abrasive cleaners.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Excessive use of adhesive sealants: While sealants are important for sealing joints, excessive use does not lead to stress cracking in the laminate itself.
  2. Inadequate hull ventilation: This issue affects moisture control and potentially leads to mold or delamination but is not a direct cause of stress cracking.
  3. Frequent washing with abrasive cleaners: This can damage the surface but does not directly lead to stress cracking caused by design issues.

Correct Answer: D) Glass fiber has high tensile strength and flexibility; resin provides good adhesion and low water absorption.

• Explanation: Glass fiber is known for its high tensile strength and flexibility, which makes it ideal for reinforcing materials and improving their strength and impact resistance. Resin (often epoxy or polyester) provides excellent adhesion, forming a strong bond with the glass fibers, and has low water absorption, which helps prevent damage from moisture and ensures durability in marine environments.

Incorrect Options:

A) Glass fiber is lightweight and has high tensile strength; resin provides high thermal resistance and rigidity.

• Explanation: While glass fiber is indeed lightweight and has high tensile strength, resin is not typically known for high thermal resistance in the context of hull construction. Instead, the resin’s low water absorption and good adhesion are more critical properties for marine applications.

B) Glass fiber is corrosion-resistant and flexible; resin has low impact resistance and high thermal conductivity.

• Explanation: Glass fiber is flexible but not inherently corrosion-resistant; rather, its strength and impact resistance are more relevant. Resin typically does not have low impact resistance or high thermal conductivity in hull construction; instead, good adhesion and low water absorption are more important.

C) Glass fiber is strong and rigid, with high impact resistance; resin is heavy and has low tensile strength.

• Explanation: Glass fiber is strong and has high tensile strength but is not typically described as rigid or having high impact resistance. Resin used in hull construction is not heavy; it is designed to be lightweight and provide strength when combined with glass fiber, not low tensile strength.

Correct Answer: B) Improved fiber-to-resin ratio, reduced air voids, better control over material properties, and enhanced structural integrity.

• Explanation:
  • Improved Fiber-to-Resin Ratio: Resin infusion molding allows for a more controlled application of resin, leading to a better ratio of fiber to resin compared to manual methods.
  • Reduced Air Voids: The vacuum process in resin infusion helps to remove air bubbles, resulting in a composite with fewer voids.
  • Better Control Over Material Properties: The infusion process provides better control over the distribution and saturation of resin, which can lead to more consistent and predictable material properties.
  • Enhanced Structural Integrity: By reducing air voids and achieving a better fiber-to-resin ratio, the final product often has improved strength and durability.

Incorrect Options:

A) Lower material costs, faster production times, and increased risk of voids in the final product.

• Explanation: While resin infusion can offer some cost benefits and faster production times compared to traditional methods, it does not typically increase the risk of voids. In fact, resin infusion aims to reduce air voids, which is an advantage over traditional methods that might have higher void rates.

C) Higher labor costs, longer curing times, and reduced control over material distribution.

• Explanation: Resin infusion molding generally reduces labor costs because it is a more automated process compared to manual methods. It also tends to have shorter curing times due to better control over the resin curing process. The method actually improves control over material distribution, contrary to what is stated here.

D) Increased use of manual labor, higher weight of the final product, and less consistent material quality.

• Explanation: Resin infusion molding is designed to reduce manual labor compared to traditional methods. It also tends to produce lighter and more consistent products due to the efficient resin distribution and reduced air voids. Therefore, this option is incorrect as it does not reflect the advantages of resin infusion molding.

Correct Answer:

B. Osmosis occurs when water molecules pass through the GRP laminate, entering voids and reacting with soluble materials within the laminate. This results in the build-up of pressure, causing the GRP layers to separate and form blisters.

• Explanation: Osmosis in GRP hulls happens when water molecules diffuse through the semi-permeable GRP laminate. Inside the laminate, the water reacts with soluble substances (like uncured resin or contaminants) present in the voids or defects. This reaction creates a liquid with a higher concentration of dissolved substances than the surrounding water, which draws more water into the void. As more water enters, pressure builds up, leading to the separation of the GRP layers and the formation of osmotic blisters on the hull. These blisters can cause structural damage if left untreated.

Incorrect Answers:

A. Water molecules diffuse from areas of low concentration to areas of high concentration within the hull, causing the GRP to weaken and leading to the formation of cracks.

• Why it's incorrect: Osmosis typically involves water moving from an area of higher concentration (outside the hull) to an area of lower concentration (inside the laminate). The description of diffusion from low to high concentration contradicts the basic principle of osmosis. Moreover, the formation of cracks is not the primary result of osmosis; rather, osmotic blisters are the typical outcome.

C. Osmosis is the process by which air bubbles are trapped in the GRP during the manufacturing process, leading to weakened spots in the hull. Over time, these spots expand and form osmotic blisters.

• Why it's incorrect: This option confuses osmosis with air entrapment during the manufacturing process. Air bubbles in the GRP may cause defects, but they are not related to the osmotic process. Osmosis specifically involves the movement of water molecules and the chemical reactions that occur inside the laminate, not the presence of air bubbles.

D. The process of osmosis involves the GRP material absorbing water, which causes the fiberglass to swell and create uneven surfaces, eventually leading to the formation of large cracks in the hull.

• Why it's incorrect: While GRP does absorb some water over time, the swelling of fiberglass and the formation of large cracks are not the direct results of osmosis. The primary concern with osmosis is the formation of blisters due to pressure build-up, not cracking due to swelling. Additionally, the swelling described here is not the same as the osmotic blistering process.

Correct Answer:

A. Sharp corners or edges in the hull design, excessive weight concentration in specific areas, and insufficient reinforcement in high-stress zones.

• Explanation:
  1. Sharp corners or edges in the hull design: Sharp corners or edges create localized stress concentrations. These points are prone to cracking because the stress is not distributed evenly, leading to stress fractures in those areas.
  2. Excessive weight concentration in specific areas: Concentrating weight in particular areas of the hull can cause localized stress. The hull may not be designed to handle such concentrated loads, resulting in stress cracking in those areas.
  3. Insufficient reinforcement in high-stress zones: High-stress areas, such as around fittings or joints, require additional reinforcement. Without adequate reinforcement, these areas are more likely to experience stress cracking due to insufficient structural support.

Incorrect Answers:

B. High moisture content in the laminate, inadequate gelcoat thickness, and poor adhesion between laminate layers.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. High moisture content in the laminate: While moisture issues can lead to delamination and osmotic blisters, they are not typically the primary cause of stress cracking. Stress cracking is more related to design and structural issues rather than moisture alone.
  2. Inadequate gelcoat thickness: This primarily affects the protection and appearance of the surface but does not directly cause internal stress cracking.
  3. Poor adhesion between laminate layers: This can lead to delamination and other internal issues but is not specifically a cause of stress cracking, which is more about structural design and load distribution.

C. Inadequate anti-fouling maintenance, frequent washing with abrasive cleaners, and poor ventilation.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Inadequate anti-fouling maintenance: This affects the protection against marine growth but does not directly cause stress cracking in the laminate.
  2. Frequent washing with abrasive cleaners: This can damage the surface finish but does not typically cause internal stress cracking.
  3. Poor ventilation: While poor ventilation can lead to moisture problems, it is not directly related to stress cracking, which is more about structural and design factors.

D. Low-quality resin, improper curing of the laminate, and excessive use of sealants.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Low-quality resin: This affects overall laminate strength and durability but is more related to general failure rather than specific stress cracking.
  2. Improper curing of the laminate: This affects the bonding and strength of the laminate but does not directly lead to stress cracking unless it results in significant structural issues.
  3. Excessive use of sealants: Sealants impact joint sealing and surface protection but do not directly cause stress cracking, which is related to structural design and load distribution.

Correct Answer: B) Placing dry glass fiber fabric in a mold, sealing the mold, and then injecting resin under vacuum pressure to infuse the fabric and cure the composite.

• Explanation: Resin infusion molding involves placing dry glass fiber fabric into a mold. The mold is then sealed, and resin is injected under vacuum pressure. This process ensures that the resin thoroughly infuses the fabric, creating a composite with uniform properties. The vacuum helps remove air bubbles and ensures a consistent resin distribution, which improves the strength and quality of the final product.

Incorrect Options:

A) Applying resin directly to layers of glass fiber mat in a mold, followed by hand-rolling to remove air bubbles and ensure even distribution.

• Explanation: This describes the hand lay-up method, not resin infusion molding. In hand lay-up, resin is manually applied to glass fiber layers, and hand-rolling is used to remove air bubbles. This process is different from resin infusion, which involves vacuum pressure to infuse the resin.

C) Spraying a mixture of glass fiber and resin onto the mold surface using a high-pressure spray gun, followed by curing at room temperature.

• Explanation: This describes the chopper gun method, which is used for spray-up applications rather than resin infusion molding. In spray-up, a mixture of glass fiber and resin is applied to the mold surface, which is different from the infusion process where dry fabric is used and resin is injected under vacuum.

D) Laying pre-formed sheets of glass fiber and resin in the mold and using heat to bond them together.

• Explanation: This describes a process similar to pre-preg lay-up or sheet molding compound (SMC), where pre-formed sheets are used and heat is applied to bond them. This is not the same as resin infusion molding, where dry fiber is used and resin is infused under vacuum.

C. Cut out the delaminated section, fill the cavity with a core material, and then cover with a new layer of laminate.

• Explanation:
  1. Cut out the delaminated section: Removing the delaminated or damaged area ensures that all compromised material is eliminated, providing a clean surface for repair.
  2. Fill the cavity with a core material: In sandwich construction, the core material (like foam or balsa) provides structural integrity. Replacing the core material restores the strength and rigidity of the hull.
  3. Cover with a new layer of laminate: Applying a new layer of laminate over the repaired area integrates it back into the hull’s structure, reinforcing the repair and restoring the original strength.

Incorrect Answers:

A. Remove the damaged area, inject resin into the void, and then apply a new layer of fiberglass cloth over the repair.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Injecting resin into the void: While injecting resin can be effective for repairing small voids or blisters, it is not suitable for extensive delamination. In sandwich construction, merely injecting resin does not address the missing or damaged core material.
  2. Applying a new layer of fiberglass cloth: This approach does not replace the core material, which is crucial in sandwich construction. The structural integrity of the hull relies on the core material in addition to the laminate layers.

B. Sand the affected area, apply a primer coat, and then repaint the hull to seal the surface.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Sanding and repainting: This method only addresses surface issues and does not repair the internal delamination or restore the structural integrity of the hull. It is a cosmetic fix rather than a structural repair.

D. Drill holes into the delaminated area to allow moisture to escape, then apply a sealant and repaint the hull.

• Why it's incorrect:
  1. Drilling holes and applying sealant: This approach is more appropriate for addressing blisters rather than delamination. Drilling and sealing do not repair the internal structural damage caused by delamination. Like option B, this method is a superficial fix and does not address the core material or structural integrity of the hull.

Correct Answer: B) Laying down multiple layers of glass fiber mat and resin in a mold, followed by a curing process, with each layer being hand-rolled to remove air bubbles.

• Explanation: The traditional method for laying up a GRP hull involves placing multiple layers of glass fiber mat (or cloth) into a mold, applying resin to each layer, and then hand-rolling the layers to ensure good resin penetration and remove air bubbles. This process builds up the hull's strength and structural integrity. After the layers are applied, the hull is cured, usually at room temperature or with heat to set the resin.

Incorrect Options:

A) Applying a single layer of glass fiber and resin using a vacuum bagging technique to ensure even distribution.

• Explanation: While vacuum bagging is a technique used in advanced composites to remove air and ensure even resin distribution, it is not the traditional method for GRP hull construction. Traditional GRP layup generally involves hand-laying multiple layers and rolling them out, rather than using vacuum bagging.

C) Spraying a mixture of glass fiber and resin onto the mold using a high-pressure spray gun for a quick and even application.

• Explanation: This describes the chopper gun method, which is not the traditional hand layup method. The chopper gun is a more modern technique used for faster application but is different from the traditional hand-layup process that involves layering and hand-rolling.

D) Inserting pre-formed glass fiber and resin sheets into a mold and heating them to set the shape.

• Explanation: This describes a process similar to pre-preg layup methods or sheet molding compound (SMC), which is not traditional for GRP hulls. Traditional GRP hulls involve applying multiple layers of glass fiber and resin separately and curing them in the mold rather than using pre-formed sheets.